Campaign finance isn’t just broken—it’s being exploited!
Web3 Rescued You From
- How ActBlue became the center of a donation fraud scandal
- The key vulnerabilities in our campaign funding systems
- How decentralized ID fixes the problem without compromising privacy
- Why this matters heading into the 2026 midterms
Web3 Rescued Insights
- A clear understanding of how donation fraud works behind the scenes
- Real examples of how DIDs like MyEarth.ID are already solving this globally
- Why Hedera Hashgraph offers the most viable, scalable solution today
- What needs to happen next—and how you can push for reform
Explore MyEarth.ID – Start Your Decentralized Identity Journey
Don’t let another scandal go unchecked. Share this post.
Ask your local candidates:
“What are you doing to
protect campaign donations from fraud in 2026?”
ActBlue, The Fraud And The Fix
The ActBlue donation scandal has brought a new level of clarity to the election integrity debate. We’ve moved beyond vague concerns about missing ballots and hacked machines to something far more tangible: financial fraud, identity misuse, and money’s unchecked influence on campaign outcomes. As a Web3 advocate focused on Decentralized ID, I see these failures not as isolated events but as symptoms of an outdated system. With secure, verifiable identity infrastructure in place, these kinds of abuses wouldn’t just be reduced—they’d become obsolete. It’s time to replace trust-by-assumption with trust-by-design.
How ActBlue Became the Center of Attention
ActBlue is widely known as the main online fundraising platform for Democratic candidates and causes across the United States. Its donation tools include branded contribution pages, recurring giving options, and one-click donations through saved payment info. These features make it easy for campaigns to raise money quickly and for supporters to give with minimal friction.
Behind the scenes, ActBlue lets campaigns create custom fundraising pages, track donations in real time, and offer supporters the option to give once or set up monthly contributions. With tools like ActBlue Express, returning donors can contribute with a single click, streamlining the process across all supported campaigns.
Possible Illegal Contributions

ActBlue’s reputation took a hit when widespread allegations of fraudulent donations surfaced in 2024. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Representative Bryan Steil, and other investigators began reviewing claims that thousands of unauthorized campaign contributions were being made using stolen identities and prepaid gift cards. Many of the affected individuals were elderly (some living with dementia), whose families discovered donations in their names that were never approved, often in suspiciously large amounts.
While early reports struggled to gain traction, new momentum came in 2025 as formal investigations began following a Republican victory. Internal leaks and public pressure led to the resignation of seven ActBlue officials. Lawmakers and watchdogs have since uncovered troubling patterns that suggest millions in questionable donations may have passed through the platform during the 2024 cycle.
I’ve watched how stories like this erode public trust. People are rightfully concerned about where the money comes from, where it’s going, and whether existing laws can keep up. These are not necessarily technical flaws, as much as willful manipulations. They create risks to the credibility of our democratic election systems.
What Went Wrong: The Gaps in the Current System
The ActBlue scandal didn’t blow up overnight. These abuses stem from long-standing weaknesses in digital donation systems—problems that have been ignored for too long.
- Poor Donor Verification: Most donation platforms, including ActBlue, don’t require donors to verify their real-world identity. That means anyone can donate using someone else’s name, email, or payment method. There’s no meaningful check at the point of entry.
- Straw Donation Loopholes: Platforms lack the ability to detect when a single source funnels money through many small, fake, or borrowed identities. Prepaid gift cards, burner emails, and spoofed addresses make it easy to disguise who’s really funding a campaign.
- Open Door to Foreign Influence: Without strong identity and origin checks, foreign actors can route money through U.S.-based names or prepaid methods that appear domestic on the surface. These funds often slip through automated filters unnoticed.
- No Strong, Auditable Records with Privacy Protection: Investigators are stuck in a bind. Either they access raw donor data and risk breaching privacy, or they’re blocked from auditing altogether. The current system offers little middle ground. That makes it harder for law enforcement to prove fraud or trace illegal money without exposing sensitive personal information.
Because of these gaps, campaigns often miss signs of fraud until it’s too late. And even when red flags are raised, tracing the true source of the money requires significant time, resources, and legal authority. By the time enforcement catches up, the damage is already done.
But there is a better way to instill trust in our system.
Worldwide Decentralized Identification (DIDs) Adoption
The path forward isn’t theoretical. It’s already taking shape around the world.
Decentralized Identification (DID) is quickly becoming a global standard for how identity should work online. It is secure, private, and fully under individual control. Imagine a digital passport that proves who you are, without handing over your personal information to platforms you don’t trust. That’s what DID delivers.
Your identity is verified once, then linked to a private, secure, encrypted wallet that only you control. From there, you can prove your identity wherever it is needed, from campaign donations to logging into government services, or accessing your health record, all without exposing any more than necessary.
Real-World Momentum Behind DIDs
Great implementations around the world.
- MyEarth.ID: A global identity solution built on Hedera Hashgraph, designed for cross-border use cases including travel, healthcare, and secure registrations. It’s privacy-preserving and tamper-proof by design.
- European Union eID Framework: The EU is rolling out a Digital Identity Wallet that gives every citizen and resident the ability to store and share official credentials securely. It’s one of the largest government-backed DID initiatives to date.
- Login with ION (Microsoft / Bitcoin): Microsoft’s ION project uses the Bitcoin blockchain to create decentralized identifiers for user authentication without relying on centralized services.
- India’s Aadhaar + Web3 Experiments: While Aadhaar is centralized, there are emerging Web3 overlays using decentralized methods to give individuals more control over how their identity is used.
Why Hedera Is the Right Fit for Campaign Finance
Hedera Hashgraph is a new kind of public encrypted ledger built for real-world performance. Unlike traditional blockchains, which process transactions one block at a time. Hedera confirms thousands of transactions in parallel. Think of it like the difference between a single checkout line and a fully staffed airport terminal. It’s faster, more energy-efficient, and far more cost-effective than one block at a time.

That makes it ideal for high-trust, high-volume environments like campaign donations, where identity must be verified, transactions must be tracked, and fraud must be prevented at scale.
- Speed: Processes over 10,000 transactions per second
- Cost: Each transaction costs a fraction of a cent
- Governance: Overseen by a global council of trusted organizations like IBM, Google, and Boeing
- Sustainability: Consumes far less energy than traditional proof-of-work systems
Instead of trying to invent something new, we should be scaling what already works. MyEarth.ID has shown how decentralized identity can be fast, private, and reliable. Integrating this into campaign finance would close the fraud gaps overnight and finally bring accountability to the funding side of elections.
With a MyEarthID, a donor could verify once with a trusted provider and use that identity across any platform, securely, privately, and without re-entering sensitive information. For campaigns, it means fewer fake donors, fewer legal risks, and more trust from the public.
These examples prove that secure, decentralized identity systems can work at scale. The question now is: why haven’t we applied them where they’re most urgently needed—like campaign finance?
DID Could Have Prevented the Scandal
Verified Donors from the Start – With a decentralized ID in place, every donor would be linked to a verified, tamper-proof identity. No more donations made in someone else’s name—no matter how clever the fraudster. Banks already use “know your customer” (KYC) protocols. Campaign platforms can do the same, without burdening everyday supporters.

No More Anonymous Gift Card Donations – Each DID wallet ties contributions to a real, verified person. That makes it nearly impossible to donate anonymously through prepaid gift cards or fake accounts. If the identity doesn’t check out, the money never moves.
Built-In Rule Enforcement Through Smart Contracts – Smart contracts on Hedera act like programmable guardrails. They can:
- Reject any donation that exceeds legal contribution limits
- Confirm donor eligibility based on verified ID
- Flag suspicious activity before funds are accepted
Campaigns wouldn’t need to chase violations after the fact. The system would enforce the rules as donations happen.
And thanks to zero-knowledge proofs, auditors could confirm legal compliance without ever seeing the donor’s personal data. This strikes the right balance between accountability and privacy, something legacy systems still struggle with.
Pattern Detection in Real Time – Because each donation is tied to a verified profile, it becomes easy to detect patterns like someone trying to game the system with dozens of small donations under the reporting threshold. These tactics would be flagged instantly and could be shut down before the damage spreads.
A Public Ledger Without Public Exposure – All donations would be recorded on Hedera’s secure, immutable ledger. That means every transaction can be audited and verified. Yet personal details remain private, protected by strong encryption and modern cryptography. Investigators get the visibility they need. Donors keep the privacy they deserve.
Why These Solutions Are Timely and Needed Now
The next test of our campaign finance system isn’t years away, it’s already on the horizon. The 2026 midterms are underway with early fundraising, and the public’s patience for fraud, manipulation, and vague accountability is wearing extremely thin.
What makes this moment different is that the stakes are high and the technology is ready. We’re no longer waiting for a solution to be invented. DID platforms like MyEarth.ID, backed by Hedera’s secure and scalable infrastructure, already proves that we can verify identity, enforce rules, and protect privacy all at once.
This is one of those rare moments in politics where the outcome is widely agreed upon:
- Only real, eligible people should fund political campaigns.
- The system should be auditable, transparent, and fraud-resistant.
- Donor privacy and data protection should not be sacrificed along the way.
Now is the time for lawmakers, technologists, election platforms, and watchdog groups to work together—not to imagine what’s possible, but to implement what’s proven. We don’t need another scandal to act. We need the will to apply the tools we already have.
Seeing the Bigger Picture is More Than Fixing Just Campaign Finance
This isn’t just about fixing ActBlue. It’s about fixing the infrastructure that allows fraud to thrive anywhere digital identity is weak. Anywhere you see a username and a password, the system is weak and can be exploited.
When you solve identity verification, you don’t just stop donation scams. You improve access to voting, strengthen public services, and protect people from impersonation in everything from healthcare to event registration.
This is a foundational problem, and we finally have the tools to fix it. A decentralized ID system, tested in the 2026 midterms, could show what secure, verifiable participation looks like in a digital democracy. Now is the time to lead with technology that protects people, not just processes.
How to Make DID on Hedera Happen: Your Next Steps
Anyone who cares about fair elections and transparent campaign finance can do their part. Reach out to the Federal Election Commission, your state reps, or party leaders to let them know why digital ID matters.
- Contact the Federal Election Commission (fec.gov), your state reps, or local campaign platforms to ask why verified digital ID isn’t already being used.
🔍 How to Find and Contact Local Campaign Platforms
If you want to help bring secure digital ID into local politics, start by reaching out to campaigns near you. Here’s how to find them:
- County Party Websites
Search for your local Democratic or Republican party websites. They often list endorsed candidates and campaign contact details.
Example search:“[YourCounty] Democratic Party”
- State Election Portals
Most states provide directories of registered candidates and campaign committees.
Start here: 👉 nass.org/Can-I-Vote - Ballot Tools and Voter Guides
Platforms like BallotPedia.org and Vote411.org offer nonpartisan info about who’s running in your district—and where to find their platform. - Local News or Civic Groups
Regional newspapers, neighborhood groups, or the League of Women Voters often publish voter guides with links to official campaign sites.
Once you identify a campaign that matters to you, ask this question:
“What are you doing to prevent donation fraud and protect voter trust in 2026?”
Share this article. Open a discussion. Ask hard questions. Help push the conversation forward.
If you’re in tech, law, or policy, this is your moment to get involved.
MyEarth.ID and Hedera Hashgraph are already doing the work.
🧩 The Real Question
Why hasn’t this been fixed already?
We have the technology. We’ve seen the consequences. And every day we delay, trust in the system erodes a little more.
The ActBlue scandal didn’t happen because of a lack of regulation. It happened because we’re still relying on outdated assumptions, anonymous donations, unverifiable transactions, and platforms that operate without modern safeguards.
The tools to stop this exist. They’re proven. They’re scalable. They’re already in use around the world.
The only thing missing is the will to apply them.
If secure, fraud-resistant campaign finance is something both sides claim to want, then it’s time to ask a simple question:
“Why haven’t we implemented decentralized identity in campaign finance yet?”
Until that answer changes, the system remains vulnerable.
For updates, collaboration, or to amplify the mission, tag @Web3Rescued on social media and help shape the future of identity, democracy, and trust.